The American cryptocurrency market is facing one of the most important political moments in recent years. The United States Senate is preparing to vote on further proceedings for the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act proposal, known as the CLARITY Act, which aims to create more comprehensive federal rules for trading digital assets, and primarily to more clearly divide authority between two main American financial regulators – the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).
The first key procedural vote is scheduled for September 15, 2026, according to the current calendar. Senate Republicans released another revised version of the bill on September 10. The outcome could significantly affect not only American cryptocurrency exchanges and token issuers, but also indirectly the global market. The United States remains one of the world’s most significant financial centers, and the way it legislatively addresses digital assets could influence their further development even outside the American market.
Article contents:
- What is the CLARITY Act?
- The House of Representatives has already approved the bill
- New version of the CLARITY Act brings additional changes
- Cryptocurrency sector wants clear rules
- Crypto firms and banking sector face off
- Democrats warn about investor protection and money laundering
- Trump's cryptocurrency activities also enter the game
- Why will the September 15 vote be so important?
- What can the CLARITY Act mean for bitcoin and cryptocurrencies?
- CLARITY Act may affect cryptocurrencies outside the US
What is the CLARITY Act?
The CLARITY Act is meant to resolve one of the problems that has plagued the American cryptocurrency sector practically since its inception: it is not always clear whether a specific digital asset falls under securities regulation or commodities regulation.
This determines which American regulator has authority over the given asset and trading platform. The SEC primarily oversees the securities market, while the CFTC traditionally handles commodity and derivatives markets.
The official CLARITY Act proposal creates a new regulatory framework for digital assets and includes, among other things, separate rules for digital commodities, their offering and trading. The law also envisions joint rule-making by the SEC and CFTC in some areas.
A significant portion of the digital commodities market would, according to the proposal, fall under the supervision of the CFTC. New registration regimes are being created for cryptocurrency exchanges, brokers, and other intermediaries, while the SEC would continue to maintain its authority in the area of securities. The goal is to create a clearer boundary between the SEC and CFTC’s powers and enable cryptocurrency firms to legally provide their services within defined rules.
This could end the situation for cryptocurrency companies where a substantial part of American regulatory boundaries was created only through individual regulatory interventions and court disputes.
You might be interested: Interview with Lucien Bourdon from Trezor
The House of Representatives has already approved the bill
The CLARITY Act is not an entirely new proposal. The U.S. House of Representatives approved it on July 17, 2025, with a vote of 294 to 134. Some Democratic representatives also voted for the legislation – according to the committee, there were 78 of them.
Another significant step came this May. The Senate Banking Committee approved the bill on May 14, 2026, with a vote of 15 to 9 and sent it forward for consideration by the full Senate. According to the official statement from the Senate Banking Committee, this was the result of nearly a year of negotiations between Republicans and Democrats.
However, this is where the legislative path became significantly complicated. The Senate did not advance the bill before the summer recess, and disputes began to intensify around its final form concerning investor protection, decentralized finance, stablecoins, money laundering, and potential conflicts of interest for political officials.
New version of the CLARITY Act brings additional changes
Republican senators released a new version of the legislative text on September 10, before lawmakers returned to Washington.
One significant change involves rules for trading protocols that are not considered fully decentralized. These so-called non-DeFi trading protocols would, according to the current proposal, have to register with the CFTC. The regulator, together with the U.S. Department of Treasury, is also tasked with preparing more detailed rules.
The updated text also clarifies that some provisions concerning decentralized finance apply to spot and cash transactions with digital commodities.
The changes respond to one of the fundamental debates surrounding cryptocurrency regulation: where truly decentralized software ends and where a financial service begins that should be subject to similar rules as a traditional trading platform. The definition of DeFi may be crucial for the future of the law.
Cryptocurrency sector wants clear rules
For a large part of the American cryptocurrency industry, the CLARITY Act represents a long-awaited attempt to end regulatory uncertainty.
Companies operating in the sector have long argued that the United States lacks a comprehensive federal framework and firms do not always have clarity in advance about whether a specific product or token falls under securities regulations.
Supporters of the law argue that a more precise division of authority between the SEC and CFTC can reduce regulatory risk for cryptocurrency firms, facilitate planning of new products, and limit the motivation to move business abroad.
You might be interested in: Top cryptocurrency podcasts
Crypto firms and banking sector face off
The battle over the CLARITY Act has meanwhile also become a significant lobbying clash. Reuters reported that during the congressional summer recess, both cryptocurrency companies and their professional organizations, as well as the banking sector, intensified their activities. Both sides tried to persuade senators directly in their home states before the September vote.
One of the key points of dispute is stablecoins and competition with traditional bank deposits.
The banking sector is particularly concerned about a situation where cryptocurrency companies could offer stablecoin users rewards or other economic incentives. According to banks, this could divert some funds from traditional deposits to digital assets. Reuters states that concerns about the impact on bank deposits are among the reasons why part of the banking lobby opposes the current proposal.
This is a dispute that goes far beyond cryptocurrencies themselves. Stablecoins are gradually becoming competition for some traditional payment and banking products, and their further development may change the way households and businesses hold and transfer money.
Democrats warn about investor protection and money laundering
Political opposition to the law is not based solely on disagreement with cryptocurrencies as such. Some Democratic senators warn that the current version of the CLARITY Act, in their view, contains overly broad exemptions and may weaken some standard investor protection mechanisms.
The minority in the Senate Banking Committee, for example, published an analysis in August stating that the proposal does not adequately address the use of cryptocurrencies in illegal financial activities and may weaken tools used against some decentralized mixers. The criticism was published directly by the Senate Banking Committee.
In another analysis, Democrats also point out possible impacts on investor protection, financial stability, and anti-money laundering rules. According to their material, the current version of the law contains five major loopholes.
Supporters of the CLARITY Act, on the other hand, argue that the proposal creates a more transparent registration system, clearer regulatory authority, and specific obligations for companies working with digital assets.
The discussion about the CLARITY Act is thus not only a clash between supporters and opponents of cryptocurrencies. It is primarily a question of how strict the rules the new market should receive and which regulator should enforce them.
Also read: Trust Wallet review: Master your cryptocurrencies with confidence
Trump’s cryptocurrency activities also enter the game
One of the most politically sensitive points is the question of ethical rules for high-level representatives of the American administration.
Some Democrats are demanding stricter limitations on the ability of elected officials and their families to financially profit from cryptocurrency projects. The dispute is primarily connected to President Donald Trump’s and his family’s cryptocurrency activities.
Senator Elizabeth Warren, for example, criticized the revised version of the law in July precisely because, according to her, it does not sufficiently limit the president’s ability to profit from cryptocurrency business.
Trump, on the other hand, supports the CLARITY Act. On August 19, 2026, he publicly called on Congress to pass the law, stating that the United States needs to create clear rules if it wants to maintain a leading position in the field of digital assets. The ethical question remains one of the obstacles in finding sufficiently broad political support.
Why will the September 15 vote be so important?
The Senate vote scheduled for September 15 does not automatically mean the final adoption of the CLARITY Act. However, it is a key procedural step that will show whether the legislation has sufficiently broad support in the current Senate for further consideration.
For Republicans, the problem is primarily the need to gain support outside their own Senate caucus. Reuters points out that the proposal faces opposition from some Democrats and some Republicans, and the outcome of the vote remains uncertain.
Moreover, time is working against lawmakers. The United States faces congressional elections in November and the window for completing the legislative process is rapidly narrowing.
If the proposal fails in the Senate or its consideration is significantly delayed, the entire process could be transferred to the next Congress.
Don’t miss: Binance seeks new MiCA license in the EU
What can the CLARITY Act mean for bitcoin and cryptocurrencies?
The law itself, of course, does not determine the price of bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies. However, its impact on the market may be significant in the long term.
The greatest benefit for investors would consist primarily in reducing regulatory uncertainty. Cryptocurrency companies could know more precisely which regulator they fall under, what registration they need, and which products they can legally offer to American customers.
For bitcoin, which has had a different status in the American regulatory environment than many other tokens in the long term, the direct change may not be so significant. The legislation may be much more significant for other cryptocurrencies, tokenized assets, decentralized finance, and American crypto exchanges.
Clearer rules can also facilitate the entry of traditional financial institutions into the market. Banks, asset managers, and investment companies, when introducing cryptocurrency products, monitor not only investor demand but also legal and regulatory risks.
Conversely, rejection of the law would extend the period when a significant part of the rules of the American cryptocurrency market is determined by existing laws, the SEC, CFTC, court decisions, and individual regulatory interpretations.
CLARITY Act may affect cryptocurrencies outside the US
Although this is American legislation, its significance is global. The European Union has already created a separate regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies through the MiCA regulation, while the United States has for a long time relied primarily on existing financial market rules and decisions by individual regulators.
The CLARITY Act represents an attempt to reduce this gap and build a more independent system for digital assets.
If the law passes, the American cryptocurrency sector will receive one of the most comprehensive regulatory frameworks in its history. If not, the debate over whether individual tokens are securities, commodities, or something in between will continue in the United States.
That’s why the vote on September 15, 2026, will be important not only for American lawmakers. The outcome will be closely watched by cryptocurrency companies, traditional financial institutions, and investors around the world.
Don’t miss: MadisonSix
